School leaving age consultation
The government has been conducting a consultation on their proposal to raise the school leaving age from 16 to 18. Several others are ongoing including the one concerning the guidelines that will govern home education, you can access the index page and see if there are any other proposals that interest you (or make your blood boil, as I found). The consultation is finishing today but I thought I would post the comments that I made. The document itself made quite infuriating reading and the question and answer format of the consultation response was dangerously twisted, many questions so phrased as to assume that you had agreed with previous questions and were in agreement with the principle of coercion. The basic premise to the proposal is that all young people between 16 and 18 should be obliged to participate in government approved courses or qualifications, with legal penalties if they fail to cooperate. It never ceases to astonish me that the powers that be think that it is acceptable to impose such draconian controls and restrictions on the lives of young people. If they were to propose a 'lifelong learning' regulation, that obliged all adults to participate in a system of 'self-improvement' throughout their working life, that they should be constantly obliged to improve their skills and advance their career on pain of having legal action taken against them there would be an outcry against such an intrusion on personal freedom, and yet politicians think nothing of proposing such a system for young people.


Anyway, this is what i wrote:


I think this green paper is approaching the issue of further learning from completely the wrong direction. The green paper contains all sorts of unspoken negative assumptions about young people and their desire to participate in and contribute to society. Young people are not cogs in a machine nor should they obliged to fit themselves in with the requirements of the economy. Young people's only responsibility is to themselves, it is to find lives and means of making a living that are both purposeful and meaningful. If people are allowed to pursue lives that are personally meaningful and self-directed the result will be a strong economy because people will feel part of society and wish to contribute to it positively. If you create a system that turns this principle on its head and tries to enforce on young people the method by which they participate it will be counter-productive. By your own admission you realise that many young people may leave the school system still without basic literacy or numeracy, therefore you acknowledge that this structure of formal 'guided' learning does not always produce the required/intended outcome. By 16 young people have already been through 11 years of compulsory schooling, and many of them find this to have been a restrictive, controlling experience that has often not been a meaningful way to gain an education. If you want young people to acquire skills and make a contribution to society (and thus to the economy) it MUST be on their own terms. If society treats young people with contempt no wonder they respond by rejecting what is offered to them by way of 'fake' choices. Taking real responsibility for their lives is what will motivate young people to make a positive contribution. Learning is about so much more than gaining bits of paper or letters after your name. If you want young people to extend their skills and knowledge it is far more vital to provide the widest possible variety of opportunities and the financial support to enable young people to pursue them, for example providing financial support for those wishing to do voluntary work as a means of learning new skills and gaining workplace experience. Surely complete flexibility has to be the way forward, allowing young people to combine work (full or part time) with learning in whatever form that might take, possibly at college or school or workplace learning, self-directed learning, informal apprenticeships, correspondence courses or open university, with voluntary work and community projects. What is important is to give value and support to all activities that young people might choose. Compulsion has absolutely no place in such an approach.